For the last few seasons, I have been using a K2 Wayback 88 with a Dynafit TLT Speed Radical binding as my deep backcountry, steep skiing, recon setup – this is the ski I use most of the time. The ski was getting soft for steeper skiing (200+ days on it), so it was time to look for a replacement. After having some issues with my other Dynafit bindings, I decided to go a different route and heard outstanding reviews about the Plum binding brand. I talked to Joel at SkiUphill in Canmore, and he helped me acquire a new K2 Wayback 88 with a Plum Oazo Binding to test out.

I’ve now used the Oazo Binding for about 50 days of skiing this season and have come to love and trust it completely. The materials and manufacturing process have created a solid binding, while the design and usability stand out from the many other bindings I have used.

The Oazo Binding is a new model from Plum this year, and the design falls between their race binding and heavier all-purpose binding models. The category of this binding is what drew me to it over the others in the Plum line. I am not a competitor in the context of the race world, but often my trips are demanding for both downhill skiing and distance covered. It sounded like the Oazo would find that sweet spot between the fast & light and freeskiing applications, which I needed it for.

The Plum Oazo Toe Piece

Light Weight

At 200g per binding the Oazo deliveries on providing a solid binding at a light weight. Admittedly it is comparable to other lightweight bindings on the market for weight with the features it provides.

No Plastic

This is probably my favorite thing about Plum bindings. Last season I had two bindings break on me while out skiing, The Oazo parts are made out of single pieces of aluminium 7075 and are not created using a forged process. Although I’m sure issues with forged aluminium parts are rare, there are still known problems that can occur in the process. Ultimately, I’m happy that a machined aluminium part has the least chance of having a defect.

This design aspect is my favourite thing about Plum bindings. Last season I had two bindings break on me while skiing, once during a four-day trip, as I was about to ski off a summit, and the second time as I entered a couloir feature from a cliff drop. All the parts are independent and can be replaced by ordering from the Plum website. This design creates a long-lasting binding where it’s easily fixable if you end up breaking a small part.


These bindings tour great, but I had a slight issue with how the risers work when I first started using them. You must hand-turn the heel piece to switch from running flat to the risers. This issue is not a game changer for me, but it took a little getting used to after having bindings that a ski pole can use to switch between flat and riser settings. Now I either reach down to switch over, or if I have a large pack, I lift my ski, take it off, turn the heel and put the toe back in. Taking off your ski sounds like more work than it’s worth, and people tend to look at me funny in the field when doing it, but I have found this method very fast and easy. Once in riser mode, you can switch between the two riser settings using a ski pole.

Since the heel piece turning mechanism is fairly stiff, you might think this is a flaw, but I have yet to mistakenly clip my heel in while touring. Incorrectly putting my heel into ski mode while touring has become an issue in some of my other bindings, and I know several other people who deal with the same problem. This is not an issue with the Oazo heel piece.

The heel piece turning mechanism is also fairly stiff. You might think this is a flaw at first but I have yet to mistakenly The toe pieces are fantastic for touring. They are solid when track-setting and packing down snow for my more novice partners, and I rarely needed to lock the toe piece out—not locking the toe piece out while on the up is important on the avalanche safety side. In the past, I always felt just a little unsettled while working a piece of questionable terrain while having my toes locked in. I have stomped around a fair bit unlocked now to test the limits of the toe pieces and outside of extremely firm snow (hard wind slab, ice, etc.) I can travel confidentially without locking my toe. While unlocked, they still come off when any twisting motion is applied, and therefore I am still confident they will come off in an avalanche or wipeout. It seems Plum found the perfect balance in their toe pieces.

The Plum Oazo Heel Piece

Release Settings

The Oazo has a forward release equal to DIN 8, which is not adjustable. This setting was a non-issue for me as I set most of my bindings to 8. The lateral release is adjustable from 4 to 10, which works fine for me. If you need a higher DIN, then obviously, this binding isn’t for you.

Downhill Skiing

In a nutshell, the Oazo feels solid and skis great. I have more confidence in a binding without plastic and feel no play in the system. I’ve taken some good airs and skied very fast through variable and/or breakable snow without feeling anything but solid. I want to mount these to a bigger ski someday to find their downhill limits, but I have a feeling the limits would be past my downhill abilities anyway. I’ve even taken the setup inbounds and for a couple of easy park laps to see if I was missing a weakness for their intended use (well, probably just outside of their intended use!) but have yet to find an issue.

No issues on the down with these bindings

Ski Crampons

I’m a big fan of ski crampons. I carry a pair 95% of the time in the backcountry (and only use them less than 1% of the time, but when needed, they are a lifesaver). I’ve had more than a few chances to try out the Plum ski crampon this season, and I much prefer their design over other brands. The main difference here is how easily they attach. They simply insert down into the binding at 90 degrees. Many ski crampon styles slide into the binding from the side and have a bit of play sideways while using them. Once inserted, the Plum crampons are firmly in place with no sideways play.

Plum Ski Crampons

The Binding For You?

I would describe the Oazo as “solid, light & dependable” – for me, this is the ultimate combination for backcountry gear, and Plum nailed it in this design. Bindings are less personal than a boot or ski, and the Oazo will be an excellent choice for most backcountry skiers. If you set your release somewhere around eight and want a lightweight binding you can depend on, the Oazo is a sure winner.

For more information about the Oazo Binding please visit

To check out these bindings in person head down to SkiUphill in Canmore

8 thoughts on “Plum Oazo Binding”

  1. Tried out the oazo binding a few weeks ago. Solid binding!
    One thing I didn’t like (or couldn’t figure out how to do effectively) was to release the front toe levers comfortably. With most touring bindings you can press down on the toe with the bottom of the pole, but there is a large hole in the front toe piece making this not possible.
    How do you step out of them?

    1. I just flip my pole over and use the handle to pop them off, or use my ski for the first one and my boot for the second.

  2. Hey quick inquiry. Your review leaves me wanting them. However I’m interested in a decently lightweight set up. Skis will likely be about 106 underfoot. Not the lightest. And I’m around 190lbs plus pack. Is the binding going to be able to take all that?

    1. For a 106 underfoot I’d probably go with a Plum Pika, which is only a little heavier than the Oazo and has a wider mounting plate for the heel. Depending on what you want your release value set at you may also want to check out the Plum Guide. I have reviews for the other two bindings on my site. I personally have a Pika on a 106 but I am a bit lighter at 160lbs.

    1. Not sure what “skier type 3+” means, but I’d probably look at Pika or maybe even a Guide for the wider base plate for that ski depending what kind of skiing you plan to do with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *